Skip to content
Penjams
  • Home
  • Blog
    • Conservative
    • Dialectic
    • Philosophy
      • Ethics
      • Liberty
      • Voting
      • Free-will
    • Theology / Religion
    • Story
    • Other Worlds
    • – Guest Posts
    • – Serial
    • – Poems
  • Podcast
  • Links
  • About
  • Thanks!
    • Buy Me a Coffee
    • Amazon Link (Shopping from it helps out.)
    • Guest Posting and More

Get Why Does Philosophy Matter?  for free along with my eletter here.

Better Libertarianism

Posted on October 19November 14

This is a bit of my episode with Iowancap in which we discuss how Libertarianism might be served by considering how various schools of ethics relate. Hear the whole episode below. Enjoy. -P

Penjammin: I was just reading For a New Liberty by Rothbard, and his last chapter is a strategy for liberty . . . He makes one caveat in there that I thought was really fascinating and perhaps a little controversial, which is really what you're saying. The idea that– well, a conservative in Congress might prefer some sort of a policy compromise or a trade where they get a little bit of this, a little bit for that. Whereas a libertarian who might want agree with the conservative on the boon, you know, that's to be had (maybe lower taxes or something), but they won't also say, “okay, but for this, what we're going to do is we're going to introduce a new act of aggression by Washington, DC against the people.” I'm not going to positively support that. I'm going to hold principle. The goal is always not to be incrementalist or gradualist, but to have the whole thing now. But with that hope, you know, firmly in place, there's you accept gains as they come. You're not going to tell them no. But he always had that caveat. It's like, “but I'm not going to vote positively against my principles. I will accept gradual movement towards them, but I will not vote against them.” . . .

Iowancap: Yet, I think there there is also an idea where, sometimes you do go for less bad. Sometimes that is the move. I think. In fact, I suddenly realized, Pen, that this all worked out perfectly because I realized that it was that phrase that I told you that I really loved, that you said, that actually launched all this thinking for me.

Penjammin: Okay.

Iowancap: And that is when I saw it, it was in a in a group chat, I saw that you made the statement: The means must be worthy of the ends.

Penjammin: Yeah.

Iowancap: And I think that is really what I'm talking about. Yes, we should keep in mind the ends. We need to keep the goals in mind. And, we shouldn't live purely principally and say, “but let's not look at what works. Let's not look at strategy, let's not look at tactics. Let's not look at reality.” At the same time, we have to always keep our principles in mind because if the means are not worthy of the ends, then you could start asking the question: “Are we really going where we think we're going?”

Penjammin: Yeah.

Iowancap: Especially as a Christian, I think that's very important because obedience to the law of God, obedience to the gospel and to Christ's commands, that is ultimately a winning strategy, even if short term it is not.

Penjammin: Right. I mean, we've already won.

Iowancap: And so I think that's really where this whole tension of principles and strategy is so important. Yeah, let's look for strategic ways to get the gospel to go out. Let's look for strategic ways to accomplish and to carve out the freedom to do the work that the church needs to do. And yet, if we at any point find ourselves going against the law of God with a sort of ends justify the means sort of mentality, then– if the means are not worthy of the ends, then we should question whether or not the means are actually going to get us to the ends that we think we're going toward.

Penjammin: Yes, because that's how you trapped. I think when you play the game, you get played by the game. It doesn't work in the long run. And, that's how I think about third-party voting as well. But I'll leave that for another time.

  • Twitter: x.com/IowancapReborn
  • Usual Co-host: x.com/JParkYYC
  • Mentioned: Patrick
  • Mentioned: For a New Liberty by Rothbard
  • The Flyover Libertarian Podcast
  • The Anarchist Bible Study Podcast
  • The Flyover Libertarian Podcast Episode 23

Penjammin grew up in a labyrinthine cavern. Later he ran with the wolves and lived every moment marinated in the sweet scent of his game, until pirates landed and… See About for full story, and get his eletter at penjams.com/subscribe.

Better Conservatism

Posted on October 11October 11

This is a bit of my episode with Iowancap in which we discuss Trump and conservatism. Hear the whole episode below. Enjoy. -P

Iowancap: At the Flyover Libertarian, which is the parent podcast, I guess you could say of The Anarchist Bible Study. On that show, we did an episode 23, Trump is a bad conservative is the title of it, but we kind of generally talked about conservatism broadly. And Penjammin, when we talked about getting him on the live stream tonight, he said he wanted to talk a little bit about what I said on that. I think that's what you were saying, right?

Penjammin: Yeah because I'm, you know, just such a bad fan that I haven't got to watch it yet. So now, if I have you here personally, I can get the scoop straight from the horse's mouth or whatever. It's an interesting subject to me in general, so I'd love to hear what your thoughts were.

Iowancap: Yeah. Just to give a brief kind of overview of that (and I recommend any anyone who wants to hear more to go over to The Flyover Libertarian podcast on — well, pretty much any app that you find, the anarchist Bible study, so whatever you're listening to this on or watching this on, go find the flyover libertarian on that same platform and watch episode 23 or listen to episode 23) — kind of the overview is we started by talking about how Trump had put up a page with his achievements, and we looked at that page and asked, so how many of these things are really things that . . . classical conservatism would really be excited about? And we said there's not a lot. But really, it got into some of my concerns, I guess, with conservatism in general . . . and ways in which I think libertarianism can help conservatism to be better.

Penjammin: Yeah ok.

Iowancap: And so one of the things that I said…

  • Twitter: x.com/IowancapReborn
  • Usual Co-host: x.com/JParkYYC
  • The Flyover Libertarian Podcast
  • The Anarchist Bible Study Podcast
  • The Flyover Libertarian podcast Episode 23

Penjammin grew up in a labyrinthine cavern. Later he ran with the wolves and lived every moment marinated in the sweet scent of his game, until pirates landed and… See About for full story, and get his eletter at penjams.com/subscribe.

Inspiring Action

Posted on September 17September 17

This is a bit of my episode with Haley Heathman in which we discuss the Liberty Alliance Network. Hear the whole episode below. Enjoy. -P

Penjammin: Please tell me more about the Liberty Alliance network.

Haley: Yeah. So I started the Liberty Alliance Network. I think it was like January of 2021. And it was, of course, as a result of the covid insanity. I was a little bit disappointed in people on our side that we were not doing enough to fight back against everything. I think by 2021, most of us on our side, in the circles that we run, we already knew. We knew enough to know that this was something wasn't right. And this was a garbage and a hoax and whatever you want to call it, plandemic. But nobody was doing anything. And I was really upset and disappointed that even people like us who should know better- We've spent our whole lives (maybe not our whole lives, but since we're libertarians) railing against government day after day after day, and here's the biggest government intrusion on our liberties in our entire life. And yet everybody was just kind of sitting on their thumbs like, “I don't know what to do.”

Penjammin: Yeah, even even the LP leadership was just like, the messaging was horrible [when] it was there at all.

Haley: Yeah. Right. And I was just like, are you kidding me? It was like, so we're all just, like, cosplaying here or something? We're just pretending to care about liberty, but we don't really? The problem with… libertarians but the right in general, I would say, we are not known to be good organizers or effective organizers. The left, of course, they can organize in a heartbeat, drop of a hat, they can get five hundred people out to protest not being able to kill babies in the womb, no problem. Us, we have to fight tooth and nail to get people involved in anything. So that's what I wanted to do. I wanted to to start a network where we could start promoting each other and our organizations. And my goal is to inspire and encourage others to take action because that's what we need. We can't just sit here and be keyboard warriors. You got to get in the fight. You have to kind of get involved. And so maybe you might not be like the type that's going to go out and start your own organization, but you might want to join up with somebody else's. And you need to know where they are.

  • Website: libertyalliancenetwork.com
  • Rumble: rumble.com/user/WhatCanWeDo
  • Wellness Box: libertyalliancenetwork.com/wellness
  • Twitter: x.com/haleyinflorida

Penjammin grew up in a labyrinthine cavern. Later he ran with the wolves and lived every moment marinated in the sweet scent of his game, until pirates landed and… See About for full story, and get his eletter at penjams.com/subscribe.

You mad bro?

Posted on September 8September 16

Michael Landon. Remember him? I stumbled upon a documentary of Highway to Heaven and was struck by a particular slice of back-when. Someone asked an actress on the show if there were any stories of trouble on-set during filming. There was one anecdote. A couple of actors were causing trouble. Maybe they were showing up late, not knowing lines, being prima donna’s… I forget. But they were grating, very annoying. Apparently they caught on to the fact that they were pushing their luck and brazenly went up to Landon with the question: “Are you mad at us?” He responded, “No, why would I be mad at someone I’m never going to see again?” And apparently, they never worked there again.

It was a word choice though that struck me. When the interviewer asked the question about trouble on-set, that lady answered, “What? You mean like someone being a stinker?” You never hear someone called a “stinker” anymore. It seems the word retired decades ago. Well, it got me thinking.

Some behaviors are repugnant, but not for anything to do with the law or personal offense or immorality. They’re just obnoxious. They stink. And aversion to literal stench is healthy. Something similar is probably true with metaphorical stench as well.

To be sure, I don’t mean to defend snubbing either the truly destitute or a normally pleasant person just going through something. But I wonder if we’ve been arm-twisted into the idea that the only reason to avoid someone (or their behavior) is if there is some level of wrong-doing. What if they’re just obnoxious?

No one wants someone stinking up the conversation with pompous or nasty tones, innuendos of aspersion, gossip or other party fouls. We try to invite good guests, but even careful effort there is no guarantee. What else can we do? I suppose we can reward earnest wonder with engagement, rather than feed the trolls, and we can be our best selves and attract the like in kind. Again, no guarantees, just helps, but for me, that's plenty for me to get to work with. Failing that, there's the block button. At least for now.

Penjammin grew up in a labyrinthine cavern. Later he ran with the wolves and lived every moment marinated in the sweet scent of his game, until pirates landed and… See About for full story, and get his eletter at penjams.com/subscribe.

Short and Sweet

Posted on August 18November 14

Who doesn’t like something extra nice crossing their feed? There’s so much nastiness to scroll through, and if it doesn't come directly, then it's indirect, by being quote-tweetedly shared by its critic. Seriously. Every June, vulgar visuals are broadcasted, not only by celebrants but by their critics.

And besides that, there’s the crazy complex busyness. The feed is a mess, posts with text commenting on a screenshot, all quoted-tweeted with yet more text followed by ellipses because the guy couldn’t be more concise—that kind of thing.

It has me missing the old creative constraints of 140 characters. (Yeah I’m one of those guys. I actually enjoyed the challenge. 🙂 )

So, a guy like me enjoys seeing the simple tweet of a short nice poem cross my feed. Limericks, I like. Haiku are nice, but for too many, they’re little more than interrupted prose. One old friend used to post nothing but three-lined shout outs, counting 5-7-5 syllables. I like to try for something with a little more of that traditional flavor. (To be sure, I have much room to grow and would like to.)

If you’d enjoy seeing the poetry I’m dropping on twitter, you can. At the end, I add a π, as a searchable endmark. (π reminds me of ποίημα / poiema, and it can also abbreviate Penjammin, so yay. 🙂 ) Anyway, it allows me to point you here: penjams.com/twitterpoems. Much of these are prompted poetry, written spur of the moment for fun and practice, but here’s a favorite haiku:

Morning mist floating
Up in early Autumn light…
Just pick a shape cloud!

Have a great week everyone.

-P

Penjammin grew up in a labyrinthine cavern. Later he ran with the wolves and lived every moment marinated in the sweet scent of his game, until pirates landed and… See About for full story, and get his eletter at penjams.com/subscribe.

Older PostsNewer Posts

 Buy me a coffee

Recent Posts

  • Conservatives conserve nothing?
  • Religion Reboot?
  • Apples and Oranges
  • Pushy Puritans Don’t Get a Pass
  • When Lies Lash Out
  • Subjective Professory
  • Silence and Starsong
  • Neighboring Faiths
  • Systematic Philosophical Theology
  • Misrepresentation Sucks

What They Say

“AMAZING and BRILLIANT”
– The Anarchist Bible Study

“[He] has a point.”
– Norm MacDonald

“…a bit of oddballery.”
– Tom Woods

Subscribe

Terran Wisdom

(Loading...)

Penjams.com is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com.

Copyright © 2026 . All rights reserved.